You write very well !haricharan wrote:Dear sinecurve,sinecurve wrote:
I am glad you brought up this story. Ok If I believe in Shani mahatmya, then it creates a huge gap in my understanding of what would ever make Lord SA happy. King Vikramaditya was an exceptional king who cared for his people like his children. He respected sages , did a lot of yagyas for the benefit of society in general, and everything possible at his end.
What did he do wrong that he had to go through such a tough Sade-Sati. Lord SA crippled him, made him serve as a servant and what not...why ? Theres not even a single mention of his past karma...only point mentioned is that he didnt think that lord SA is paramount of all planets, specially being son of other planet, which is suppose to be source of life.
True remedies of SA are donations, helping the needy, feeding the strays and refraining from ego and arrogance. Right ? Now as text mention, our heroic King of Ujjain was already blessed with all those qualities, and better...then why such an excruciating and hideous sade-sati for him.
Doesnt that leaves us bewildered, that of whatever path we follow...if SA is badly placed in chart then we will have to suffer. Period !
The king did have all the qualities you mentioned but one , "refraining from ego and arrogance". After becoming charkravarty samrat , he became very proud of his might , out of which he dared to challenge the justice of Shanidev, because just studying the vedas and attending to sabhas of learned ones had not brought the true wisdom to him. His true potential got covered , and hence Shani dev decided to bless him with that one quality , only after which he indeed became the great king that we all know him as. This is the quality of humbleness.
He was like a shining piece of metal , very hard to break , but was not shining as much as he could due to embedded impurities. So Shanidev had to melt him so the impurities could be separated and when the metal cooled again, it had a great shape and shining more than ever.
So you tell me , was he punished or was he blessed by Shani dev? This is the mahima of shani dev.
As I write this, my heart has filled with bhakti of lord Shani :
Jai jai jai Shani dev. Sachha nyaya sada tum karte , tumse log vyarth hi darte.
'Challenge' is stretching it a bit, but King did question the 'divine justice' which I am sure any intelligent and rational mind would, for he was the chakravarty Samrat, and he was that way for his qualities. He was always very humble to my knowledge just that his ignorance could not understand the 'extreme cruelty' of Lord SA , even for his own father, and thats why he said what he said.
Even in my dreams, I cant dare to question his supreme justice and I fully agree that the king was eventually blessed, tho it was slightly harsh. My point is that inspite of being religious, humble, righteous, philanthropist etc. to his best possible efforts, he still went through the pain. Tho you say that his humbleness only appeared after Wohlwill process, which I was not aware before.
Thanks for replying !




