How to find whether the Horo belongs to male or female.

[Dr.Atul]

Respected Sandhu ji

Nice to see you here

Kind Regards
Atul

[lovacrs]

Dear Sandhuji,

Does not seem to work in my case. Lagna rashi 3+surya rashi 11+ rahu rashi 6 =20/4. Remainder is 0, but I am a male. (20jun60,Mysore,15:10). Since Me and Ve dasha have gone well, I feel I am a Ge ascendant.

CRS
PS: I have just started learning astrology. I hope my post does not offend you.My intention is to learn a bit on this.

[Dr.Atul]

Respected Sandhuji,

I agree with you about MB. That is less a forum and more a commercial entity.

They demand money for putting a link in signature. They want money for posting a link in the post. They do not want anybody else to post informative articles in Learn Vedic astrology forum, because do not want others to start parrallel classes.

I posted few posts there and then I came to know about above rules and I stopped posting. After some days some member invited me to post my articles in "Vedic astrology forum". I agreed. When I had a look at the posts I realized that it is not a better idea.

But I think the information available there is very good and Rishi Rahul and Vivek are doin a good job. But I will avoid posting my blogposts there.

I hope you will bestow your light on us here.

Kind Regards
Atul

[lovacrs]

Thanks Sandhuji,

Yes. I am reasonably sure that the lagna is Ge. Apart from the fact that my Me and Ve dasha were good, general traits are also Ge like. Ke dasha was also good but then Ke is in 10th/9th in Pi based on whether lagna is Ge/Cn.

The rule does not seem to work in a few other charts that I have.

CRS

[Dr.Atul]

Hello,

This formula actually originated from a commentary on "Lal Kitab" by Ramendra Bhadoriya. Lal kitab has a tendency to make simple things complicated. No explanaton of this formula have been given.

for example, in this formula, there is no need to divide the total of three rashi numbers by 4. In a simple logic it can be said that if the total is an even number then the chart is of a female and if the total is an odd number then the chart is of a male.

If we further simplify ths formula, the basis of this formula is to note the sex of rashis of Rahu, sun and lagna are placed in. When all these three are in same sex signs (either male or female) then this formula works well and most of the time result correspond to the real gender of the person.

When all these three are in male (odd) signs then the total is odd number and vice versa.

But when these three are in different signs (two in male and one in female or vice versa) then this formula is not 100% accurate and also does not seem to follow any pattern. Like when two of these are in male sign then the total is an even number which indicates a female chart and when two of these are in female signs then the result is an odd number which indicate a male chart. and this comes out to be wrong when compared to reality half the times.

This book is published by Respected Sandhuji on Scribd. Since three months I am working on this but till now not successful in breaking the code

I hope someone who follows lalkitab here can clarify this formula well.

Kind Regards
Atul

[Meena]

The formula seems to be correct. It perhaps indicate the % of feminine qualities in a male and % manly qualities in a female.Manly female and feminine man ? we find many such variations around us. Even modern medicine tell the role of hormones a deciding factor in humon behaviour.

[lovacrs]

Since Jyothish already recognises neuter gender (Sa and Me), I dont think we should explain negative tests using "gray scales". There may be stronger reasons like birth time inaccuracies or ayanamsha related issues.

CRS