jhora or net softwares???

Any other questions not listed above.
Forum rules
READ Forum-Wide Rules and Guidelines NOTICE: OFFENSIVE POSTS WILL BE DELETED, AND OFFENDERS WILL HAVE ALL POSTS MODERATED.
Post Reply
sachinder
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 144
Joined: 18 Jun 2013

respected astrologers
I wanted to know which is more accurate jhora or net softwares like astrosage etc because I am finding a lot of difference like avasthas shadbala etc kindly throw some light
lovacrs
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor
Posts: 911
Joined: 18 Feb 2009

The difference could be simply due to the preferences in JHora. Try various settings from preferences and then try to match with astrosage.
LOVACRS
sachinder
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 144
Joined: 18 Jun 2013

thanks for reply.
actually I am new to the software and trying to understand it.
P.Srinivas. Rao
Donor
Donor
Posts: 1288
Joined: 18 Oct 2010

Variation in Shadbala points among software happens because they take different paddathis in calculation.

Some take Parashara Paddathi ( J Hora ) and few take B. V. Raman or Bhaskaracharya or Sripathi paddathi or Yama koti/ ancient prime meridian paddathi or Ujjain/ Lanka method.

Chesta Bala:- Parashara light or Kala software calculate Chesta bala for Ravi and Chandra also . Whereas J Hora shows the points of Chesta bala for Ravi and Chandra also but wont take this into total points.

Since there is no retrogression for Ravi and Chandra, Chesta bala need not be calculated.

Paksha Bala:- Paksha bala for Moon is always Double the point. Whereas Kala and parashara light won’t show the double point to Moon.

Ayana bala:- Ayana bala for Ravi is always the Double. Whereas Kala and Parashara light has not provided the doble point to Ravi.

Paksha bala for Budha:- J hora takes Vargothama budha as benefics instead of malefic . Hence there is variation in shadbala points among softwares.( For eg:- Vrischika lagna – Budha is in 8th in his own rashi and vargothama. J hora takes this Budha as SAMA and not as MALEFIC graha. ) One should take Mercurys nature in paksha bala.Mercury turns malefic if it is associated with malefic. While some astrologers assume that the lord of eighth house is always malefic.Authentic texts indicate the nature of the eighth lord is to be judged by the lordship of other houses it owns.

Saptha vargiya bala and Kendra bala;- Some softwares takes Bava Chalitha chart for arriving the figure of Sapthavargiya and Kendra bala ( which is not right ).

Ubhayodaya Rashi:- Pisces is ubhayodaya rashi . But some software takes Gemini also as Ubhayodaya rashi and hence there is difference in Bava bala points.


Minimum Shadbala points and Maximum Shadbala points:- Some will follow B.V.Ramans minimum and maximum shadbala points . Hence there is difference in percentage in shadblala points. For Eg :- Minimum shadbala points to Ravi is 6.5 as per Parashara .Whereas it is 5 points as per B.V.Raman

Conclusion;- As per me, J hora is more authenticated than any other softwares in terms of Shadbala calculation.He takes Parshara paddathi and not B.V.Ramans paddathi. Therefore it is better to set J hora under Parashara paddathi in related Calculation of grahas.



http://srath.com/jyoti%E1%B9%A3a/mundan ... lis-anger/
Astrology is not a Science of light, but it is the Science of life
sachinder
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 144
Joined: 18 Jun 2013

thanks for you reply
Post Reply