Not seen in the Jaimini astrology,yet. In Jaimini astrology the reference point is Karkamsha Lagna or Arudha Lagna, not the lagna. As Per Bhavartha Ratnakar Sun in 12H is very good , make you fartunate regarding the things which Sun signifies . Sun is in the 12H in the chart of Roger Federer, Clinton, Mr Ghandhi, Madona, Tony Blair,Bush[jr]. regardsHey ChandraLagna,
Thanks for your inputs.
I am sorry, if my previous post was not clear. Let me explain a bit thoroughly
What is Marana Karaka Sthana? (Weak) (Significator) (Position)...that is exactly what it is. It literally does not mean the planet is dying. Take a deeper look.
For example a person with Sun MKS AK in 12th. Sun is Sun. Soul's desire is to rule but he is in seclusion in 12th? So what will he do? Catch hold of a bigger ruler than him, keep him in good books and feel like he/she is ruling with his help Sun AK in 12th there feels awkward but is making the best of the situation.
Shani MKS AK in 1st. Soul loves to work hard but because he is in 1st, instead of feeling kingly about his accomplishments he wants to come accross as a humble, hardworker. Fits the description of a hard working personality that hates limelight even though he/she deserves it. Shani AK in 1st feels uncomfortable if he gets attention
Mars MKS AK in 7th. Soon realises that getting confrontational with business partners/spouse does the native no good and so learns to tone down/negotiate
Guru in 3rd -Excellent for 9th but what about 3rd house of desires and initatives? Could be great from a spiritual perspective but not so good wrt third house matters. Of course other mitigating factors could very well be there in horoscope.
Request for horoscope compatibility analysis
Forum rules
READ Forum-Wide Rules and Guidelines NOTICE: OFFENSIVE POSTS WILL BE DELETED, AND OFFENDERS WILL HAVE ALL POSTS MODERATED.
READ Forum-Wide Rules and Guidelines NOTICE: OFFENSIVE POSTS WILL BE DELETED, AND OFFENDERS WILL HAVE ALL POSTS MODERATED.
A person should not be too honest. Straight trees are cut first and honest people are screwed first.
“Reasoning with a drunkard is like
Going under water with a torch to seek for a drowning man.”
“Reasoning with a drunkard is like
Going under water with a torch to seek for a drowning man.”
If wish to say Jaimini Sutras give the most of the Yogas with respect to KL and AL. Lagna is only used for the calculation of 5L. I do not come across a sutra where it is mentioned with respect to Lagna. I have fifty charts of celebrities, where Sun is in 12H.In Jaimini astrology the reference point is Karkamsha Lagna or Arudha Lagna, not the lagna.
MKS concept is from SJC schools to which Narasimha Rao sir belongs as well.
A person should not be too honest. Straight trees are cut first and honest people are screwed first.
“Reasoning with a drunkard is like
Going under water with a torch to seek for a drowning man.”
“Reasoning with a drunkard is like
Going under water with a torch to seek for a drowning man.”
I have no views of my own, just follow ''Jaimini Sutram''am not sure about your view of Jaimini, but in SJC school where my jaimini studies are mostly from, we use lagna quite well in Jaimini and not just for calculating 5th lord. MKS is SJC jaimini concept too and I have seen it work in my experience.
Regards,
SriRama
A person should not be too honest. Straight trees are cut first and honest people are screwed first.
“Reasoning with a drunkard is like
Going under water with a torch to seek for a drowning man.”
“Reasoning with a drunkard is like
Going under water with a torch to seek for a drowning man.”
-
deeps
Rama, I am absolutely stunned to read natives with 4 deb. planets are doing great in life!!!...This is too much!!!..Can you share their details and their stories?Sri Rama: "Little knowledge of astrology is dangerous. It could make you very biased and inclined to give totally off track predictions. 3 deb planets doesn't make automatically make a rasi chart bad. I have seen people with 4 deb planets in rashi doing great in life and I have seen charts with many exalted planets go through so many challenges."
Hi Sri Rama,SriRama wrote:I have seen people with 4 deb planets in rashi doing great in life and I have seen charts with many exalted planets go through so many challenges.
What do you think is the reason for what you have mentioned? I get your point that a chart has to be seen overall, but when 4 planets in a chart gets debiliated, it means many of the houses, which are lorded by those planets have turned very weak. How can in spite of that a person have a great life? Having an ordinary life is understandable, but how a great life? Same is my question when it comes to charts having exalted planets giving difficult lives.
Amitabh Bacchan, such a super star, has 4 planets in the 8th house, and it's not something excellent, I feel. When a person has one planet in the 8th house, we make such a big issue of it, and 4 planets in that house is no way good if one thinks logically. And to get so much success in spite of that! Don't you think it's just not making sense! Tell me something, if that chart was presented to you, and nothing was said about who it belonged to, would you have predicted the success for him now that you would do knowing he has had a successful life so far? Don't you think we are trying to just tally the charts as per people's lives?
This principle that 'a chart has to be seen overall' is I feel an excellent principle, but it is wrongly utilized more, I feel, as it holds the power to prove anything, making the weakest chart look strong, and the strongest, weak as per the need of the situation, that is, to prove that the chart is making sense.
In my few years in astrology, I have seen that this point is employed only when it comes to post mortem of charts, never when it comes to giving predictions. Please tell me honestly has it ever happened to you that you have seen a chart, which looked apparently horrible, with say maybe 5 planets in the 8th house, and you predicted that that very combination will make the person find huge success? If you have done that, then this point of seeing the overall chart makes sense, or else this very principle can be used for a completely opposite reason: to make sense of a chart, even when your logical mind is saying it is making no sense at all.
Last edited by basab14 on 01 Aug 2012, edited 3 times in total.
"Go thou and follow Him, who was born and gave His life for others five hundred times before He attained the vision of the Buddha!" -- Swami Vivekananda
Anuradha ji,anuradha wrote:I have fifty charts of celebrities, where Sun is in 12H.
Would like to know in those 50 charts of celebrities what was that you found common in all of them, other than this that there is Sun in the 12th house in every one of them. There must be something in their charts, which have made them huge successes in their lives, so what was it, you feel?
"Go thou and follow Him, who was born and gave His life for others five hundred times before He attained the vision of the Buddha!" -- Swami Vivekananda
Sri Rama,
You can't pick up the chart of a celebrity as because no one can confirm whether the time of birth is correct or not. And then, Rahu and Ketu are shadowy planets, and you can't count them when you say 4 planets are debiliated. They don't lord any house after all.
Coming to the other chart, it is interesting that the person didn't have much success in spite of a strong chart. I agree with you that the concepts that you have talked about like badhakesh, mks, vargattoma etc should be considered, but you didn't answer my point on whether you have seen charts of people, who you know nothing about, which have apparently looked weak and correctly said the person will rise, and vice versa.
The points you have mentioned helps very well in doing post mortem of charts. The more theories one is equipped with, the more easy it becomes to give an explanation for a chart, which doesn't seem to make sense apparently. Hope you are getting my point.
I will make the same point as I made last time: if you had not been told the chart of Aishwarya was that of her, would you have been able to say seeing the chart that it belongs to a person who is a super star with a super successful life?
You can't pick up the chart of a celebrity as because no one can confirm whether the time of birth is correct or not. And then, Rahu and Ketu are shadowy planets, and you can't count them when you say 4 planets are debiliated. They don't lord any house after all.
Coming to the other chart, it is interesting that the person didn't have much success in spite of a strong chart. I agree with you that the concepts that you have talked about like badhakesh, mks, vargattoma etc should be considered, but you didn't answer my point on whether you have seen charts of people, who you know nothing about, which have apparently looked weak and correctly said the person will rise, and vice versa.
The points you have mentioned helps very well in doing post mortem of charts. The more theories one is equipped with, the more easy it becomes to give an explanation for a chart, which doesn't seem to make sense apparently. Hope you are getting my point.
I will make the same point as I made last time: if you had not been told the chart of Aishwarya was that of her, would you have been able to say seeing the chart that it belongs to a person who is a super star with a super successful life?
Last edited by basab14 on 02 Aug 2012, edited 2 times in total.
"Go thou and follow Him, who was born and gave His life for others five hundred times before He attained the vision of the Buddha!" -- Swami Vivekananda
-
deeps
Hi Rama,
There are many birth details of her circulating around on the net. Some even claiming that she herself consulted them. Herself? Then how come different, why all astrologers analysing from different data. Bejan Daruwala, a celebrated astrologer, himself use Virgo lagna and proved that this is the correct lagna.
So I can't comment further. About betul chart, I have not seen that. I need to see that.
Further, some say Rahu is exalted in gemini, some say in Taurus, again it is all controversial. So I can't consider Rahu to be debilitated in this case.
There are many birth details of her circulating around on the net. Some even claiming that she herself consulted them. Herself? Then how come different, why all astrologers analysing from different data. Bejan Daruwala, a celebrated astrologer, himself use Virgo lagna and proved that this is the correct lagna.
So I can't comment further. About betul chart, I have not seen that. I need to see that.
Further, some say Rahu is exalted in gemini, some say in Taurus, again it is all controversial. So I can't consider Rahu to be debilitated in this case.
Sri Rama,
As per BPHS, Rahu is exalted in Taurus, and we can't ignore what it says.
As per BPHS, Rahu is exalted in Taurus, and we can't ignore what it says.
"Go thou and follow Him, who was born and gave His life for others five hundred times before He attained the vision of the Buddha!" -- Swami Vivekananda
-
deeps
Hey Deeps,
Thank you for the prompt reponse. For Phalitas Dashas and Chara karkas Jaimini says that exaltation of Rahu in Gemini. In lord SriRama's chart debilitated rahu in saggi in 6th house is a great placement and it is called by a special name called kodanda rahu. Many astrologers and great rishis have stressed the kodanda rahu in Lord SriRama's chart. Therefore Ra exalted in Ge sounds convincing.
So, irrespective of what time of birth she has or what lagna she has, it does not change the fact that there were 4 debilitated planets in rasi on the day she was born
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
SriRama
BPHS is the father of all astrology.Sri Rama,
As per BPHS, Rahu is exalted in Taurus, and we can't ignore what it says.
Sri Rama,
I know Rahu and Ketu lords those two signs, but I said they don't lord any house, I didn't talk about signs. You may say that the houses, which correspond to those signs should be considered, but they are lorded by the planets representing them as well, and so we don't give much importance to Rahu/Ketu for that reason. How many times have you taken Rahu as the lord of a house, or Ketu as the lord of a house when analysing a chart? So what you are saying is good for the sake of argument, that is, it is technically correct, but otherwise, it is not a strong point to consider. Anyway, it's your opinion, and I don't want you to change that.
Yes, I know, no astrologer can figure out a chart completely, but I was not talking about that at all, but was saying this that when we see a chart of a person, whose life we don't know about, and the chart is apparently a very negative one or a positive one for that matter, we don't have the interest to use the subtle principles of astrology to find out the truth behind it--it's only when we do post mortem of charts that we use all those subtle principles to prove our point.
You have posted the chart of Aishwarya Rai, and I wonder if any seasoned astrologer would, if not told whose chart it is, be able to predict just this simple point that she will do very well in her career, which doesn't need him to be 100% accurate, but just predict the most basic thing in the chart. I say this because I have read in K.N. Rao's book "Ups and Downs in Career" in the article written on Amitabh Bacchan his mother telling Mr Rao that none of the astrologers had been able to predict the success of his son beforehand, and it makes sense their not being able to predict it as so many planets are in his 8th house. But now that he is a super-star, they will write 10 page analyses saying why his chart makes such a lot of sense.
I know of someone, who has 4 planets in the 6th house, 2 planets in the 8th house, and one planet in the 12th house, so 7 out of 9 planets in the dusthanas and was predicted a horrible future by almost every astrologer he had consulted. What will you tell him, seeing his chart? Would you take time out to find the subtlety of the combinations in it, or just straight away say that his life will be one of terrible misery? He is doing very well in life. He is minting money, sitting at home (he has a website, which is the source of his income), has a wonderful married life, and a very sweet, angel looking child. He is leading one of the most comfortable life I can say, and a very luxurious one, too. Now that I have told you what his life is, immediately you will bring out those combinations that you use only when you do post mortem of charts and start saying, why his life makes sense from his chart.
See, all I want from the astrologers is honesty. They should be honest when they don't understand a chart. If you see a chart, you should try to think, would you have given those astrological logic that you are giving if you had not known about the person's life, and if you wouldn't have done that, you should say, the chart is not making sense to you, than give an astrological explanation, somehow, taking help of the hundreds of combinations that fit the purpose.
One should be honest with himself as it's only when one is that, he can make progress in his astrology studies. That's what I believe in. Having a different rule when it comes to doing post mortem of charts, where the most difficult combinations will be deeply probed and somehow proved to be the best combinations, and in giving predictions about people you don't know about, where those same combinations would be said to be bringing disaster for the person, without not probing them deeply, is just being dishonest to yourself and to the person, who is seeking help from you.
The content of this post is not pointed at you, Sri Rama, even though it is addressed to you, so don't take it in that sense. I am just making a point here--something which I have observed in the last few years.
I know Rahu and Ketu lords those two signs, but I said they don't lord any house, I didn't talk about signs. You may say that the houses, which correspond to those signs should be considered, but they are lorded by the planets representing them as well, and so we don't give much importance to Rahu/Ketu for that reason. How many times have you taken Rahu as the lord of a house, or Ketu as the lord of a house when analysing a chart? So what you are saying is good for the sake of argument, that is, it is technically correct, but otherwise, it is not a strong point to consider. Anyway, it's your opinion, and I don't want you to change that.
Yes, I know, no astrologer can figure out a chart completely, but I was not talking about that at all, but was saying this that when we see a chart of a person, whose life we don't know about, and the chart is apparently a very negative one or a positive one for that matter, we don't have the interest to use the subtle principles of astrology to find out the truth behind it--it's only when we do post mortem of charts that we use all those subtle principles to prove our point.
You have posted the chart of Aishwarya Rai, and I wonder if any seasoned astrologer would, if not told whose chart it is, be able to predict just this simple point that she will do very well in her career, which doesn't need him to be 100% accurate, but just predict the most basic thing in the chart. I say this because I have read in K.N. Rao's book "Ups and Downs in Career" in the article written on Amitabh Bacchan his mother telling Mr Rao that none of the astrologers had been able to predict the success of his son beforehand, and it makes sense their not being able to predict it as so many planets are in his 8th house. But now that he is a super-star, they will write 10 page analyses saying why his chart makes such a lot of sense.
I know of someone, who has 4 planets in the 6th house, 2 planets in the 8th house, and one planet in the 12th house, so 7 out of 9 planets in the dusthanas and was predicted a horrible future by almost every astrologer he had consulted. What will you tell him, seeing his chart? Would you take time out to find the subtlety of the combinations in it, or just straight away say that his life will be one of terrible misery? He is doing very well in life. He is minting money, sitting at home (he has a website, which is the source of his income), has a wonderful married life, and a very sweet, angel looking child. He is leading one of the most comfortable life I can say, and a very luxurious one, too. Now that I have told you what his life is, immediately you will bring out those combinations that you use only when you do post mortem of charts and start saying, why his life makes sense from his chart.
See, all I want from the astrologers is honesty. They should be honest when they don't understand a chart. If you see a chart, you should try to think, would you have given those astrological logic that you are giving if you had not known about the person's life, and if you wouldn't have done that, you should say, the chart is not making sense to you, than give an astrological explanation, somehow, taking help of the hundreds of combinations that fit the purpose.
One should be honest with himself as it's only when one is that, he can make progress in his astrology studies. That's what I believe in. Having a different rule when it comes to doing post mortem of charts, where the most difficult combinations will be deeply probed and somehow proved to be the best combinations, and in giving predictions about people you don't know about, where those same combinations would be said to be bringing disaster for the person, without not probing them deeply, is just being dishonest to yourself and to the person, who is seeking help from you.
The content of this post is not pointed at you, Sri Rama, even though it is addressed to you, so don't take it in that sense. I am just making a point here--something which I have observed in the last few years.
Last edited by basab14 on 03 Aug 2012, edited 2 times in total.
"Go thou and follow Him, who was born and gave His life for others five hundred times before He attained the vision of the Buddha!" -- Swami Vivekananda
Sri Rama,
Thanks for not taking my post in the wrong sense. I agree with you that astrology is a difficult subject, and one masters it only after studying it thoroughly and practising it for a long time as you have said.
Thanks for not taking my post in the wrong sense. I agree with you that astrology is a difficult subject, and one masters it only after studying it thoroughly and practising it for a long time as you have said.
"Go thou and follow Him, who was born and gave His life for others five hundred times before He attained the vision of the Buddha!" -- Swami Vivekananda
Chandra lagna, Anuradha and Rama:
I feel though theories of astrology talk about badhakesa and MKS, I feel these are overrated concepts when used for predicting, by some astrologers.
I have seen sun in 12th at our own institution and he like any other one, got what he wanted and retired. He was bold and on his own, never listened to others.
My both sisters have saturn in lagna, and they are very hard working. I have jup in 3rd and rahu in 9th.
Jupiter did not kill my drive.
Dev
I feel though theories of astrology talk about badhakesa and MKS, I feel these are overrated concepts when used for predicting, by some astrologers.
I have seen sun in 12th at our own institution and he like any other one, got what he wanted and retired. He was bold and on his own, never listened to others.
My both sisters have saturn in lagna, and they are very hard working. I have jup in 3rd and rahu in 9th.
Jupiter did not kill my drive.
Dev
OK Rama:
I know mine is too complex. Anyway I sometimes feel I have nature of all 9 planets since all are interconnected and my nature also is having all those qualities I feel.
Anyway jup bukti in venus dasa was best till now and it gave me job, PhD and good name and all that. Most important of all, my mother was happy I got job and PhD and her being happy made me happy
I can give other horos details, one born after about 2 weeks had 2 planets shifted but is so different, though lot of similarities are there.
Dev
I know mine is too complex. Anyway I sometimes feel I have nature of all 9 planets since all are interconnected and my nature also is having all those qualities I feel.
Anyway jup bukti in venus dasa was best till now and it gave me job, PhD and good name and all that. Most important of all, my mother was happy I got job and PhD and her being happy made me happy
I can give other horos details, one born after about 2 weeks had 2 planets shifted but is so different, though lot of similarities are there.
Dev
Respected LOVA astrologers
My marriage seems to have entered the last phase. It is getting worse by the day. It is just a matter of time. My wife is just not coming to any sort of compromise;
However, deep within, I still feel we will get back together. Astrologically speaking is there any such hope? Or should I just go with the flow and accept things as they come.
I feel exalted Saturn in 8th house(in transit) is set to unleash all the negative effects in full fury. Is there any hope at all? I have never ever felt so depressed in my life before. I am not sure what my next step is going to be.
I kindly request all the astrologers of this forum to provide me some guidance. Is it time for me to pay for all the sins of my previous lives? or any twig in sight for this sinking soul?
Regards

My marriage seems to have entered the last phase. It is getting worse by the day. It is just a matter of time. My wife is just not coming to any sort of compromise;
However, deep within, I still feel we will get back together. Astrologically speaking is there any such hope? Or should I just go with the flow and accept things as they come.
I feel exalted Saturn in 8th house(in transit) is set to unleash all the negative effects in full fury. Is there any hope at all? I have never ever felt so depressed in my life before. I am not sure what my next step is going to be.
I kindly request all the astrologers of this forum to provide me some guidance. Is it time for me to pay for all the sins of my previous lives? or any twig in sight for this sinking soul?
Regards
-
sathya prakash
- Registered User

- Posts: 42
- Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Rajath,
Were you able to unite together ?
hopefully give a good end to this thread..
Were you able to unite together ?
hopefully give a good end to this thread..
Very rightly said!.Yellow wrote:Sri Rama,
Yes, I know, no astrologer can figure out a chart completely, but I was not talking about that at all, but was saying this that when we see a chart of a person, whose life we don't know about, and the chart is apparently a very negative one or a positive one for that matter, we don't have the interest to use the subtle principles of astrology to find out the truth behind it--it's only when we do post mortem of charts that we use all those subtle principles to prove our point.
You have posted the chart of Aishwarya Rai, and I wonder if any seasoned astrologer would, if not told whose chart it is, be able to predict just this simple point that she will do very well in her career, which doesn't need him to be 100% accurate, but just predict the most basic thing in the chart. I say this because I have read in K.N. Rao's book "Ups and Downs in Career" in the article written on Amitabh Bacchan his mother telling Mr Rao that none of the astrologers had been able to predict the success of his son beforehand, and it makes sense their not being able to predict it as so many planets are in his 8th house. But now that he is a super-star, they will write 10 page analyses saying why his chart makes such a lot of sense.
I know of someone, who has 4 planets in the 6th house, 2 planets in the 8th house, and one planet in the 12th house, so 7 out of 9 planets in the dusthanas and was predicted a horrible future by almost every astrologer he had consulted. What will you tell him, seeing his chart? Would you take time out to find the subtlety of the combinations in it, or just straight away say that his life will be one of terrible misery? He is doing very well in life. He is minting money, sitting at home (he has a website, which is the source of his income), has a wonderful married life, and a very sweet, angel looking child. He is leading one of the most comfortable life I can say, and a very luxurious one, too. Now that I have told you what his life is, immediately you will bring out those combinations that you use only when you do post mortem of charts and start saying, why his life makes sense from his chart.
See, all I want from the astrologers is honesty. They should be honest when they don't understand a chart. If you see a chart, you should try to think, would you have given those astrological logic that you are giving if you had not known about the person's life, and if you wouldn't have done that, you should say, the chart is not making sense to you, than give an astrological explanation, somehow, taking help of the hundreds of combinations that fit the purpose.
One should be honest with himself as it's only when one is that, he can make progress in his astrology studies. That's what I believe in. Having a different rule when it comes to doing post mortem of charts, where the most difficult combinations will be deeply probed and somehow proved to be the best combinations, and in giving predictions about people you don't know about, where those same combinations would be said to be bringing disaster for the person, without not probing them deeply, is just being dishonest to yourself and to the person, who is seeking help from you.
The content of this post is not pointed at you, Sri Rama, even though it is addressed to you, so don't take it in that sense. I am just making a point here--something which I have observed in the last few years.
Thanks Yellow for spot on. Leave the Astrology world. This applies to everybody on this earth. We are dishonest, lacks integrity and always try to justify our mistakes rather than accpeting it and our next generation copies us and these are the core reasons for all the evils happpening now.See, all I want from the astrologers is honesty. They should be honest when they don't understand a chart. If you see a chart, you should try to think, would you have given those astrological logic that you are giving if you had not known about the person's life, and if you wouldn't have done that, you should say, the chart is not making sense to you, than give an astrological explanation, somehow, taking help of the hundreds of combinations that fit the purpose.
friends in one jyotish digest magazine (april june 2005) waifred c sukiyaki told what you know? you see down
it is a pleasure to give advice, normal to ignore it, most people who ask advice from others have already resolved to act as it pleases them.
october 20 1934 7:32 tokyo japan - Libra lagna - LL debilitated - 12 + 6 Lord is putting aspect for 7H. still she marry prince of japan and is became queen also. till today no divorce. name is what know? Michiko Shoda. you do google and see. wait i will only give link you see - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empress_Michiko
so sun vargothama debilitated venus near deep debilitation point and guru is a combust. 7 lord dispositor is a debilitated vargothama. still she is marry till today. so simply because debilitation planet is there it is not they are became a useless.
it is a pleasure to give advice, normal to ignore it, most people who ask advice from others have already resolved to act as it pleases them.
boy is tellingby rajath25 » 03 Aug 2010 09:25
May 25th 1982, Gangavathi(also spelt as Gangawati), Karnataka, India - 2.35 AM
The girls birth details:
November 3rd 1985, Mysore, Karnataka, India, 6.20 am
now see one chart i will put -by rajath25 » 18 Apr 2011 04:44
Now getting to the astrological part, as someone with interest in astrology and knowing just the 'abc' of it, i rejected this proposal as soon as I had a look at my wife's horoscope.3 debilitated planets-Sun , Jupiter and Venus- would render all good yogas in her chart ineffective and the effects of debilitated planets would also be there.
october 20 1934 7:32 tokyo japan - Libra lagna - LL debilitated - 12 + 6 Lord is putting aspect for 7H. still she marry prince of japan and is became queen also. till today no divorce. name is what know? Michiko Shoda. you do google and see. wait i will only give link you see - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empress_Michiko
so sun vargothama debilitated venus near deep debilitation point and guru is a combust. 7 lord dispositor is a debilitated vargothama. still she is marry till today. so simply because debilitation planet is there it is not they are became a useless.
[quote="sathya prakash"]Rajath,
Were you able to unite together ?
hopefully give a good end to this thread..[/quote]
By the day, chances of us getting back together is diminishing; she has stopped answering my calls since November. Somewhere deep within I feel we can still get back together. but I am not sure if my hope is like a mirage in the desert or something which will bear fruit with regular prayers and sincere devotion.
I am unable to give any positive outcome to this issue of my mine at this stage. There is only so much a person can do; as they say, man proposes GOD disposes.
So many people lose their lives around the world everyday due to freak mishaps. Well, GOD sure does not want sinners.
A battered soul
Were you able to unite together ?
hopefully give a good end to this thread..[/quote]
By the day, chances of us getting back together is diminishing; she has stopped answering my calls since November. Somewhere deep within I feel we can still get back together. but I am not sure if my hope is like a mirage in the desert or something which will bear fruit with regular prayers and sincere devotion.
I am unable to give any positive outcome to this issue of my mine at this stage. There is only so much a person can do; as they say, man proposes GOD disposes.
So many people lose their lives around the world everyday due to freak mishaps. Well, GOD sure does not want sinners.
A battered soul
Girl:DOB: 01-mar-1988
Time: 07:35 PM (Tuesday)
Place: Bangalore
Raasi: Karkataka
Nakshatra: Ashlesha, 3 pada
boy:DOB: 16-Aug-1983
Time: 12:05 AM (Midnight)
Place: Bangalore
Raasi: Vrishika
Nakshatra: Vishaka, 4 pada
Please let me know how our marital life will be. Also he is working abroad, so will we be together? Would there be any major difficulty (like staying separate or health issues) if we marry?
Please advice. I am very confused about this.
Time: 07:35 PM (Tuesday)
Place: Bangalore
Raasi: Karkataka
Nakshatra: Ashlesha, 3 pada
boy:DOB: 16-Aug-1983
Time: 12:05 AM (Midnight)
Place: Bangalore
Raasi: Vrishika
Nakshatra: Vishaka, 4 pada
Please let me know how our marital life will be. Also he is working abroad, so will we be together? Would there be any major difficulty (like staying separate or health issues) if we marry?
Please advice. I am very confused about this.




