Bhai - This is the discussion I was expecting which nobody gave me. You are on the money about Shukra and Buddha. But there is a caveat. I shall explain the exceptions to combustion below:astroboy wrote:Sonu ji , 48 runs . proof that Combust planets deliver short .by astrosonu » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:06 pm
It will be worthwhile to watch COMBUSTION effect of Sangakara.. Lets wait and watch.. Ideally Sangakara should go on to make a hundred with selfplaced expansive jupiter. Point is what is the degree of Combustion . There lies the trick . Guru is one planet I have see which gets affected by Combustion more , Rather than Shukra and Budha . I dont know why , But it seems to be the case most of the time .
One more point , I have read in a kannada text that Shukra and Shani become stronger under combustion . I dont know the logic , I dont know who the author of the original quote is . If I come across this sloka again I will post it here .
1. Labha lord in own sign even if it is combust will deliver good results
2. Shukr and Shani even when combust still acount for longevity of the person
These are two exceptions that i encountered in BPHS for combustion. Regarding Mercury the principle comes from my Guru that Mercury periods of combustion are not that bad. But only provides razor sharp intellect. The frustration part COULD be true though.
When India played bangladesh, Sehwag the opener was 7th lord Jupiter in Pisces in tenth alone.
Same with Andrew Strauss. He scored 158 in Ind-Eng match.
Same with Ricky ponting for his 100 in Ind-Aus match
Same for Riyaz who took 5 - 46 in Ind-Pak match.
But why Sanga could not match these in this match..??? Combustion. 3 degrees seperation provided atleast 48 runs. Further close combustion would have reduced the score further for him.
Murali the last person also represented Jupiter as sagittarus. No wickets for him. Groin injury. Cant bend to field, Cant jump to catch...
Zaheer Khan the 9th player in indian team.. Combustion did him in last 3 overs.. Mahela thrashed him...
Parasara mentions it clearly that Any planet close to Sun looses its lustre. Neither of Sanga, Sehwag, Murali, Zaheer could shine inspite of good efforts. But Gambhir was not.. Why because it is Mercury and Suns rays least affects it, as it is always close to Sun. Mars is 5 degrees Sun is 18. Mahela worked better than others.
Since you are keen on exploring astrology sir you will definitely understand what i mean here. I wish some of others here had the same mindset.
Best Regards
Sonu





