elipsis wrote:
Also Yogas don't exist in D9 if they don't exist in D1, you can only find an effectiveness of an existing yoga if present in D1.
Namashkar Elipsis ji,
While I respect your knowledge and the depth of your studies immensely, I am sorry to differ on the above conclusion that you have drawn. Before I would like to place my point, I would like to warn you that I am not very well experienced in expressing my viewpoints through writing and therefore I excuse if my way of writing seems confusing and bizarre and if it fails to convey the message clearly.
I believe every divisional chart deals with a specific area of life and each divisional chart can carry yogas that are relevant to the area of life it represents. The yogas in that case are specific to the chart, unless they are present in D1 too, in which case they become a common yoga. There are many horoscopes in which we cannot make any conclusion based on the 10th house in D-1 about the career of the native, but when you make an autopsy and view his D-10, we could see a lot of yogas in the D-10 chart that guarantees the native a very good career, compared to what we could infer from his/her D-1.
Similarly, if in a person's horoscope I see his/her 7 house or its lord afflicted, but with some benefic aspects too and if these benefic aspect causing planets form a very strong yoga in D1, I can still get confused and predict that this person would eventually get married, though the affliction(for example from saturn) gives some delay. But when I get into the D-9 and if there are some planetary combinations that show sanyasi yoga or Tapaswi yoga or Sadhu yoga, then based on these yogas we can be sure that there is a significant probability that this person might not get married at all and that might be totally independent of the affliction and yogas seen in D-1. Therefore, if there is no yoga in D-1 and if it is present in a divisonal chart, say for example D-9, then I would consider that yoga whenever I study about the native's relationship and everything related to the native's marriage. I would use the yogas caused in a divisional chart and the planets involved in the yogas to predict whether or not the native gets benefited in the area corresponding to that divisional chart in the current MD/AD/PAD(transits).
In my opinion, there is no fixed character to any functional benefic or malefic planet in a horoscope and they behave differently on different areas of life. If I could see a planet as a functional malefic on the native's D-1 chart and if I see the same planet forming some powerful yogas in his/her divisional charts, I would conclude that the planet under study would not create any obstruction(or rather the obstruction by that planet is negligible) to that native in the areas corresponding to the divisional chart in which it forms the yoga, even though the planet is a functional malefic from the overall perspective seen through D1. I would even go one step further to say that the same planet that we labelled as a functional malefic from D-1, if found to be a yogakaraka /yogada in a specific divisional chart, the areas in life corresponding to that divisional chart would be greatly benefited from that planet and in its MD specifically.
I think the very essence and heart of Indian astrology lies in the divisional charts, yogas and dashas and if we are going to make the judgements about the life of the native, just on the basis of D-1 and the yogas in it, there is a greater probability that we would fail in our predictions. Besides, this is not the style in which our ancients wanted us to understand and predict about the native under study.
Hoping to hear your views on this.
Thank you
Regards,
Prakruthi
