Hi all,
There seems to have been a basic
difference of emphasis in one matter.
While I have looked at the Mahatma's
chart with an emphasis on analysing
Grahana Yoga of 10L Moon in the 10H
with no reference to ruling dashas,
the analysis of others has focussed
primarily on relating the events of
partition to dashas in the Mahatma's
chart and also to downplay the role
of Grahana Yoga involving 10L
Moon in the 10H.
Turning my attention now to the
Mahatma's dasha during partition,
Jupiter as 3L & 6L retrograde in
the 7H is the most damaging
planet in his chart. It is no surprise
that Jupiter brought him misery &
eventually death. The 3L & 6L
aspects all the Raja Yoga planets
in the Lagna causing harm.
Jup-Ketu led to his asassination.
Ketu is in 4th, a moksha trikona
aspected by sign lord Sat who
is 4L & 5L in 2H aspecting 8H.
It is likely that the Mahatma
was near Moksha since he was
in fact a saint. His exclamation
of "Hey Ram" even at the point
of death testifies to his deeply
spiritual nature putting him
among saints many rungs
above statesmen.
One question remains: Does Jupiter have any
link with the luminaries especially Grahana
Yoga of Moon as 10L in 10H? KP astrology
reveals this link. You may know that the
KP system divides each nakshatra into
further divisions. The key deciders
of destiny are the nakshatra lord which
shows the trend of the dasha and the
sub lord who confirms or denies and
thus actually decides the result
indicated by the star lord.
Jupiter is located in the star of Sun,
11L in 12H showing end (12H) of powers
(11H) and the sub lord is, not surprisingly
the Moon, the Grahana Yoga planet
significantly eclipsed as 10L in 10H for
public affairs. Thus, the Grahana Yoga
of Moon as 10L in 10H eclipsed by Rahu
was indeed the deciding factor in
making Gandhi's last days a disaster
in many ways.
What Solar astrology (signs) has
indicated broadly has been confirmed
and pinpointed by stellar astrology
(nakshatras).
-----------------------------
Note: Since Mahatma Gandhi is a revered "Father
of the Nation" for Indians, his example seems to
stir strong feelings in many Indians. While this
may be noble and patriotic, it can cloud objective
analysis seriously. It also rouses deep feelings
for no good reason.
Further, I have already stated my case and elaborated
on it fully. What you think is upto you. Each person is
entitled to his own opinions. I have said whatever I
had to say several times. I have nothing further to say.
Therefore, for me personally, I consider the debate
on the Mahatma to be closed.
Thanks to all who shared.
Regards,
Ashok