You are having dualistic ideas, Sankaracharaya says - there is no two, only one. And that two is what's deluding you. The truth is you are the architect, master and the slave, the victor and the vanquished. I suggest you read advaita philosophy or Isopanishad. Rig Vedic ideas was too tricky to grasp that's why it degenerated into dualism and Adi Shankara tried his best to explain that to the masses, the reference to agni is actually not referred to outer agni, they are talking about yourself.
Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isha_Upanishad
SUPER POWERFUL RAHU IN 10TH HOUSE
Forum rules
READ Forum-Wide Rules and Guidelines NOTICE: OFFENSIVE POSTS WILL BE DELETED, AND OFFENDERS WILL HAVE ALL POSTS MODERATED.
READ Forum-Wide Rules and Guidelines NOTICE: OFFENSIVE POSTS WILL BE DELETED, AND OFFENDERS WILL HAVE ALL POSTS MODERATED.
I apologize, but I can't stop myself when there are any misinformation being spread around, that's what comes to dibilitated jupiter. Anyway, when it comes to this person who aspires to be actor, in this case there is red flag going up. Rahu isn't exalted, then there is an influence of Saturn and Sun. Before looking at D10, one must analyze the basic strength of the horoscope.
As of Dec 2015 I am no longer active on this forum. If you have any questions related to my topics you can contact me via email by clicking on my username. I very much enjoyed contributing on this forum.
-
Bhimaparakrama
- Contributor
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 01 Mar 2012
Dear elipsisji,
Shripada Adi Shankara's Adwaita philosophy was refuted many times. His Bhashyam on Brahma Sutra lays the foundation of Adwaita philosophy and monism. However his Bhashyam is clearly refuted by Shri Bhasyam of Ramanujacharya, the four commentaries of Shri Madhwacharya etc.
Shri Madhwa was a direct shishya of Bhagwan Shri VedaVyas the Author of the Brahma Sutras. Even Shri VedaVyas wrote a natural commentary on Brahma Sutras, called the Bhagwata Purana. This is clearly stated in Bhagwat Purana in a conversation between Shri Narada and Vedavyasa. Shri Vedavyas compiled the four Vedas, Brahma sutras, Mahabharata etc. However he was not satisfied:
"Śrī Vyāsadeva said: All you have said about me is perfectly correct. Despite all this, I am not pacified. I therefore question you about the root cause of my dissatisfaction, for you are a man of unlimited knowledge due to your being the offspring of one [Brahmā] who is self-born." (BP: 1.5.5)
"Śrī Nārada said: You have not actually broadcast the sublime and spotless glories of the Personality of Godhead. That philosophy which does not satisfy the transcendental senses of the Lord is considered worthless."(1.5.8 )
"Although, great sage, you have very broadly described the four principles beginning with religious performances, you have not described the glories of the Supreme Personality, Vāsudeva." (1.5.9)
"Those words which do not describe the glories of the Lord, who alone can sanctify the atmosphere of the whole universe, are considered by saintly persons to be like unto a place of pilgrimage for crows. Since the all-perfect persons are inhabitants of the transcendental abode, they do not derive any pleasure there." (1.5.10)
And last Shri Narada instructs Vyasadeva to write about the glories of Shri Narayana:
"Please, therefore, describe the Almighty Lord's activities which you have learned by your vast knowledge of the Vedas, for that will satisfy the hankerings of great learned men and at the same time mitigate the miseries of the masses of common people who are always suffering from material pangs. Indeed, there is no other way to get out of such miseries." (1.5.40 )
Shripada Shankaracharya himself admits in the introduction to his Gita Bhashyam:
"nārāyaṇaḥ paro 'vyaktād"-- "Narayana is not part of this material world, he is beyond."
Shri Shankara's above statement is of course understandable as is clear from the following shlokas.
In Shiva purana Shri Mahadeva Shiva is instructed by Bhagwan Shri Krishna thus:
""In Kali-yuga mislead the people in general by propounding imaginary meanings from the Vedas to bewilder them."
Then in Padma Purana Shri Mahadeva says to his consort Shrimati Parvati devi:
""The Mayavada philosophy, Siva informed his wife Parvati, is covered Buddhism. In the form of a brahmana in the kali-yuga, I teach this imagined philosophy."
Hence Shri Mahadeva appeared as Shri Shankara to teach this "imagined" philosophy Adwaita,to mislead the people.
Basically the reason was to return the supremacy of the vedas, which were abandoned by Shri Vishnu in his Budha avatara, since the bewildered people were using the Karma Khanda portion of the vedas to perform animal sacrifices merely for their own enjoyment. Hence he rejected the vedas. Shri Shankara came to reestablish the supremecy of the vedas, however this could not be done in its entirety at once. He purposefuly wrote commentaries on the vedas that were not much different from buddhist thought. This is evident from the above quotation in padma purana. In due course acharyas came (Ramanuja, Madhwa, Shri Chaitanya etc.) to bring back the real meaning of the vedas.
Please don't be mislead by non-dualism.
Shripada Adi Shankara's Adwaita philosophy was refuted many times. His Bhashyam on Brahma Sutra lays the foundation of Adwaita philosophy and monism. However his Bhashyam is clearly refuted by Shri Bhasyam of Ramanujacharya, the four commentaries of Shri Madhwacharya etc.
Shri Madhwa was a direct shishya of Bhagwan Shri VedaVyas the Author of the Brahma Sutras. Even Shri VedaVyas wrote a natural commentary on Brahma Sutras, called the Bhagwata Purana. This is clearly stated in Bhagwat Purana in a conversation between Shri Narada and Vedavyasa. Shri Vedavyas compiled the four Vedas, Brahma sutras, Mahabharata etc. However he was not satisfied:
"Śrī Vyāsadeva said: All you have said about me is perfectly correct. Despite all this, I am not pacified. I therefore question you about the root cause of my dissatisfaction, for you are a man of unlimited knowledge due to your being the offspring of one [Brahmā] who is self-born." (BP: 1.5.5)
"Śrī Nārada said: You have not actually broadcast the sublime and spotless glories of the Personality of Godhead. That philosophy which does not satisfy the transcendental senses of the Lord is considered worthless."(1.5.8 )
"Although, great sage, you have very broadly described the four principles beginning with religious performances, you have not described the glories of the Supreme Personality, Vāsudeva." (1.5.9)
"Those words which do not describe the glories of the Lord, who alone can sanctify the atmosphere of the whole universe, are considered by saintly persons to be like unto a place of pilgrimage for crows. Since the all-perfect persons are inhabitants of the transcendental abode, they do not derive any pleasure there." (1.5.10)
And last Shri Narada instructs Vyasadeva to write about the glories of Shri Narayana:
"Please, therefore, describe the Almighty Lord's activities which you have learned by your vast knowledge of the Vedas, for that will satisfy the hankerings of great learned men and at the same time mitigate the miseries of the masses of common people who are always suffering from material pangs. Indeed, there is no other way to get out of such miseries." (1.5.40 )
Shripada Shankaracharya himself admits in the introduction to his Gita Bhashyam:
"nārāyaṇaḥ paro 'vyaktād"-- "Narayana is not part of this material world, he is beyond."
Shri Shankara's above statement is of course understandable as is clear from the following shlokas.
In Shiva purana Shri Mahadeva Shiva is instructed by Bhagwan Shri Krishna thus:
""In Kali-yuga mislead the people in general by propounding imaginary meanings from the Vedas to bewilder them."
Then in Padma Purana Shri Mahadeva says to his consort Shrimati Parvati devi:
""The Mayavada philosophy, Siva informed his wife Parvati, is covered Buddhism. In the form of a brahmana in the kali-yuga, I teach this imagined philosophy."
Hence Shri Mahadeva appeared as Shri Shankara to teach this "imagined" philosophy Adwaita,to mislead the people.
Basically the reason was to return the supremacy of the vedas, which were abandoned by Shri Vishnu in his Budha avatara, since the bewildered people were using the Karma Khanda portion of the vedas to perform animal sacrifices merely for their own enjoyment. Hence he rejected the vedas. Shri Shankara came to reestablish the supremecy of the vedas, however this could not be done in its entirety at once. He purposefuly wrote commentaries on the vedas that were not much different from buddhist thought. This is evident from the above quotation in padma purana. In due course acharyas came (Ramanuja, Madhwa, Shri Chaitanya etc.) to bring back the real meaning of the vedas.
Please don't be mislead by non-dualism.
i dont understand how can planets work differently for different people....
this is chart of a famous bollywood actor
lagna -pieces
lagna lord guru debilited in 11th house
rahu debilated in saggitarius 10th house with sun-mercury..... with saturn-ketu in 4th house aspecting 10th
rahu's dispositor guru debilated in 11th house capricon..with venus....
moon in cancer in 5th house..mars in 2nd house........
then how can this person with debilated rahu with sun-saturn influence be such a huge star in debut movie........??? i found that he was in his rahu-venus dasa
or is it gajakesari yog??
can rahu-venus dasa give such a huge benefit even if it is not well placed?
plz dont take it in wrong way....
this is chart of a famous bollywood actor
lagna -pieces
lagna lord guru debilited in 11th house
rahu debilated in saggitarius 10th house with sun-mercury..... with saturn-ketu in 4th house aspecting 10th
rahu's dispositor guru debilated in 11th house capricon..with venus....
moon in cancer in 5th house..mars in 2nd house........
then how can this person with debilated rahu with sun-saturn influence be such a huge star in debut movie........??? i found that he was in his rahu-venus dasa
or is it gajakesari yog??
can rahu-venus dasa give such a huge benefit even if it is not well placed?
plz dont take it in wrong way....
Last edited by xxyyzz on 18 Mar 2012, edited 1 time in total.
-
Bhimaparakrama
- Contributor
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 01 Mar 2012
Yes Narayanji it is me 
Oh and that name haha well as my name is Bhima, but thought that is too short so, I remembered from Vishnusahasranamam the shloka "Janano jana janmadi, Bhimo Bhimaparakramaha" And so I thought let it be Bhimaparakrama
Oh and that name haha well as my name is Bhima, but thought that is too short so, I remembered from Vishnusahasranamam the shloka "Janano jana janmadi, Bhimo Bhimaparakramaha" And so I thought let it be Bhimaparakrama
-
Bhimaparakrama
- Contributor
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 01 Mar 2012
Dear xxyyzz,
If you wish to do acting for the sake of acting because that is what gives you happiness, and is what you are comfortable with and that is what you feel is your dharma then definitely go ahead. However if you want to do acting for the stardom, to be famous, be a celebrity live the celebrity lifestyle, then I beg you to reconsider. You are not aware of what is the cost of becoming a famous and rich star. I urge you to check some videos on youtube entightled "The music industry exposed". This is an example of what awaits you. It is the same in Hollywood, Bollywood, xyzwood etc. It is not worth to literaly sell your soul just for a couple decades of fame and celebrity lifestyle. For thousands of lives you will be paying for a couple years of fame. Is it worth it? These people will all suffer tremendously for many many lives for what they did. (Just check the youtube videos and you will know what I am talking about).
If you are destined to be famous you will be anyway, just beware of the consequences, these "agents" know exactly what they are doing, even if it may sound stupid as they know people like you would do anything to get famous and rich. They make you sell your sould, even though you are not aware of it.
However if you don't become a megastar, consider yourself lucky. You have saved yourself from a big sack of karmic baggage.
If you really have that desire to become famous and a celebrity, then do penance to Lord Mahadeva Shiva, he is very easily pleased by sincere penance and you may get your reward in this life or the next. Just look at history in the scripture, whenever someone wanted some material benefits he went and did penance, mostly to lord Mahadeva. Just remember Arjuna for the Pashupata astra, Jayadratha to get the boon of killing the pandavas, Draupadi in her previous life to get a good husband etc. etc.
If you wish to do acting for the sake of acting because that is what gives you happiness, and is what you are comfortable with and that is what you feel is your dharma then definitely go ahead. However if you want to do acting for the stardom, to be famous, be a celebrity live the celebrity lifestyle, then I beg you to reconsider. You are not aware of what is the cost of becoming a famous and rich star. I urge you to check some videos on youtube entightled "The music industry exposed". This is an example of what awaits you. It is the same in Hollywood, Bollywood, xyzwood etc. It is not worth to literaly sell your soul just for a couple decades of fame and celebrity lifestyle. For thousands of lives you will be paying for a couple years of fame. Is it worth it? These people will all suffer tremendously for many many lives for what they did. (Just check the youtube videos and you will know what I am talking about).
If you are destined to be famous you will be anyway, just beware of the consequences, these "agents" know exactly what they are doing, even if it may sound stupid as they know people like you would do anything to get famous and rich. They make you sell your sould, even though you are not aware of it.
However if you don't become a megastar, consider yourself lucky. You have saved yourself from a big sack of karmic baggage.
If you really have that desire to become famous and a celebrity, then do penance to Lord Mahadeva Shiva, he is very easily pleased by sincere penance and you may get your reward in this life or the next. Just look at history in the scripture, whenever someone wanted some material benefits he went and did penance, mostly to lord Mahadeva. Just remember Arjuna for the Pashupata astra, Jayadratha to get the boon of killing the pandavas, Draupadi in her previous life to get a good husband etc. etc.
-
vpn
3rd lord exalted in lagna leads to exalted desires, my friend...that's all i'm gonna add...you're way way way too ambitious, do a bit of meditation to sort of calm yourself down, i'll only add that much....even i've an exalted 3rd lord in the lagna and i've been told what i'm telling you....and know what, it's a fact...even i'm way too ambitious...
wish you all the best in life, pal!
vish
wish you all the best in life, pal!
vish
-
Bhimaparakrama
- Contributor
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 01 Mar 2012
Haha oh dear Narayanji you don't need to worry about that 
no parakrama here 
Bhima
no parakrama here Bhima
to
sunjit86
in classical texts it is mentioned that rahu in 10 house combined with kendra-trikon lord becomes yogkaraka....
and aquarius is considerd its own house...
so rahu is in own house in own nakshatra and aspected and combined with all 3 trine lords and 4th & 2nd lord too.
so it becomes rajyog karaka in its dasa.......
yes rahu does not have shadabala strenght but we can judge its power by its lord and its combination......
plz correct me if i m wrong....
just started learning astrology
sunjit86
in classical texts it is mentioned that rahu in 10 house combined with kendra-trikon lord becomes yogkaraka....
and aquarius is considerd its own house...
so rahu is in own house in own nakshatra and aspected and combined with all 3 trine lords and 4th & 2nd lord too.
so it becomes rajyog karaka in its dasa.......
yes rahu does not have shadabala strenght but we can judge its power by its lord and its combination......
plz correct me if i m wrong....
just started learning astrology
can you quote the name of the classical text and the number of the sloka please.by xxyyzz » Sat Mar 17, 2012 6:16 pmto
sunjit86
in classical texts it is mentioned that rahu in 10 house combined with kendra-trikon lord becomes yogkaraka....
and aquarius is considerd its own house...
Through hard work and spiritual practices, a person gets honor and dignity. The lazy one who puts in no efforts is like a fool who allows salt to be spilled on the wounds of his misfortunes. The idler depending only on fate, achieves nothing. - K.N.Rao ji
to
astro boy sir,
http://www.barbarapijan.com/bpa/Graha/R ... n_page.htm
i read it somewhere on this site
astro boy sir,
http://www.barbarapijan.com/bpa/Graha/R ... n_page.htm
i read it somewhere on this site
She is referring to the yoga where a Kendra lord is in conjunction with Rahu. Jaganath Hora has this yoga as well. however, i have yet to see this in BPHS.astroboy wrote:can you quote the name of the classical text and the number of the sloka please.by xxyyzz » Sat Mar 17, 2012 6:16 pmto
sunjit86
in classical texts it is mentioned that rahu in 10 house combined with kendra-trikon lord becomes yogkaraka....
and aquarius is considerd its own house...
xyz,
Rahu in conjunction with GL/HL also produces a Maha- Yogada, i believe, according to Jaganath hora. I have no idea what that yoga is but its listed on jaganath hora.
The reason i ask is because i also have rahu in 10th house. Its in my LL's nakshatra.
I HIGHLY DOUBT Rahu has shadbala strength.
The only way to judge strength in my view is by the Astakavarga but then again, i think that would be a conjuction of bhava strength and planet strength.
xxyyzz wrote:to
sunjit86
in classical texts it is mentioned that rahu in 10 house combined with kendra-trikon lord becomes yogkaraka....
and aquarius is considerd its own house...
so rahu is in own house in own nakshatra and aspected and combined with all 3 trine lords and 4th & 2nd lord too.
so it becomes rajyog karaka in its dasa.......
yes rahu does not have shadabala strenght but we can judge its power by its lord and its combination......
plz correct me if i m wrong....
just started learning astrology
Also, i am not a believer in the fact that rahu shares ownership of aquarius.
In that case, i will be extremely lucky to have the 9th lord in my 10th house (Rahu) and 10th Lord in the 9th House (Jupiter).
However, i am yet waiting for the dashas so that is as much as i can comment.
to
sunjit 86
even i have read it in many sites that rahu-saturn are co-owners of aquarius...
rahu is in its own nakshatra satbhisa is true....
i dont know whether rahu can give vipret raja yoga of exchange of 9&10th lord//
& i got this from google
MAHA YOGADA: If a planet simultaneously aspects, placed in or own Lagna, HL and GL (or seventh from them), then he becomes Mahayogada. The Mahayogada in its dasa bestow excellent prosperity in the antarof an auspicious planet (related to the yogada by aspect, conjunction or exchange).
if this yog applies to me then i m waiting for its result....
i m in rahu-rahu-venus mahadasa...........
sunjit 86
even i have read it in many sites that rahu-saturn are co-owners of aquarius...
rahu is in its own nakshatra satbhisa is true....
i dont know whether rahu can give vipret raja yoga of exchange of 9&10th lord//
& i got this from google
MAHA YOGADA: If a planet simultaneously aspects, placed in or own Lagna, HL and GL (or seventh from them), then he becomes Mahayogada. The Mahayogada in its dasa bestow excellent prosperity in the antarof an auspicious planet (related to the yogada by aspect, conjunction or exchange).
if this yog applies to me then i m waiting for its result....
i m in rahu-rahu-venus mahadasa...........
-
vpn
i don't know much, but yes, rahu's best in aquarius, sunjit! technically, though, rahu and ketu own no houses or lord over none!
