Hi Khoo:
I dont know if others are going to comment on this. It definitely cannot be generalised and is likely to be wrong for all of us, conjuntion of other planets can make it to be ineffective. Some are married and I dont know about Sai Baba.
See like I said in the other post about sat deb in navamsa as yogakaraka and the lady being lucky. So it is funny so I asked why the general rule fails and so on, there must be some reason.
Dev
Deleted
Forum rules
READ Forum-Wide Rules and Guidelines NOTICE: OFFENSIVE POSTS WILL BE DELETED, AND OFFENDERS WILL HAVE ALL POSTS MODERATED.
READ Forum-Wide Rules and Guidelines NOTICE: OFFENSIVE POSTS WILL BE DELETED, AND OFFENDERS WILL HAVE ALL POSTS MODERATED.
-
Khoo Hock Leong
- Frequent Contributor
- Posts: 7758
- Joined: 03 Jan 2009
Dev
I have already qualified myself already that one has to look at the specifics of the chart. I have already mentioned that so I do not know why you still insist that I generalise on it.
Please make sure you read my reply first before you start making any comments.
Ven+Satu is given by BPHS and it is acknowledged by Rafael Gendarz. That is what I am saying. But you still have to look at the specifics of a chart.
I really think I have to ignore your queries from now on. The last time when this happened I did not even bother to read what you write as a follow-up. I must resolve to do that now for the last time.
However, any erroneous comments you make on any new posts I put up, I would have to put it right like how you tally up the Ashtakavarga scores instead of the parameters I used to guage the strength of a chart in one of my recent posts.
But I would not be addressing to you directly.
I have already qualified myself already that one has to look at the specifics of the chart. I have already mentioned that so I do not know why you still insist that I generalise on it.
Please make sure you read my reply first before you start making any comments.
Ven+Satu is given by BPHS and it is acknowledged by Rafael Gendarz. That is what I am saying. But you still have to look at the specifics of a chart.
I really think I have to ignore your queries from now on. The last time when this happened I did not even bother to read what you write as a follow-up. I must resolve to do that now for the last time.
However, any erroneous comments you make on any new posts I put up, I would have to put it right like how you tally up the Ashtakavarga scores instead of the parameters I used to guage the strength of a chart in one of my recent posts.
But I would not be addressing to you directly.
Hi Khoo:
U seem to be very sensitive. Is it not good to have astavarga score for analysis? Many astrologers use that. Anyway I just wanted a healthy discussion and I am not there to hurt u, I am just raising my doubts.
In the other post too, I gave examples of chart with debilitated planet in navamsa who are doing well, it is a normal question raised and if it hurts u, I dont know what to do. I am just asking them how u can explain such debilitation planets helping them if it is not cancelled in navamsa.
Dev
U seem to be very sensitive. Is it not good to have astavarga score for analysis? Many astrologers use that. Anyway I just wanted a healthy discussion and I am not there to hurt u, I am just raising my doubts.
In the other post too, I gave examples of chart with debilitated planet in navamsa who are doing well, it is a normal question raised and if it hurts u, I dont know what to do. I am just asking them how u can explain such debilitation planets helping them if it is not cancelled in navamsa.
Dev
