The Nakshatras - Discussion and Inputs for Me

[P.Srinivas. Rao]

Sir astro sonuji,


They have already got it now . They are super fast, they are busy in reading that.

[Nitin21]

Ok guys here's a ready reckoner I created for myself. All the nakshatras, their degrees, rulers, nakshatra padas and pada rulers. Download it from the link below if you like.

http://rapidshare.com/files/457025464/Nakshatras.pdf

swamykool

Coolantji - You are true to your name. Amazing stuff in one PDF. Thank you.

Regards
Sonu

[Nitin21]

Sir astro sonuji,


They have already got it now . They are super fast, they are busy in reading that.

Dear Rao sir - That book got "Granny Award" . Only people who can read it are the ones who have chandra exalted in all 12 houses and who have atleast 3 glasses of somras every 10 minutes for 3 consecutive days without a break. . please tell me, who can qualify for this. Hence the book is not visible on the stalls and is available only on special request sent via "Chim Ping Ling Tung Publications"

Regards
Sonu

[kandhan]

Ok guys here's a ready reckoner I created for myself. All the nakshatras, their degrees, rulers, nakshatra padas and pada rulers. Download it from the link below if you like.

http://rapidshare.com/files/457025464/Nakshatras.pdf

swamykool

"Unassigned file limit of 10 downloads reached."

Swamycoolji, any other way of getting it?

[Nitin21]

Ok guys here's a ready reckoner I created for myself. All the nakshatras, their degrees, rulers, nakshatra padas and pada rulers. Download it from the link below if you like.

http://rapidshare.com/files/457025464/Nakshatras.pdf

swamykool

"Unassigned file limit of 10 downloads reached."

Swamycoolji, any other way of getting it?

emailed you sir..

[kandhan]

Toa chie, Sonuji.

[Nitin21]

bu yong xie kandhanji

[kandhan]

i know only one Rohini Nakshtra person. although the person is charming none of the negative traits are exhibited. ofcourse, the universal rule is to look at other factors too.

Edited:

" he will suffer because of friends who are evil in nature. ....... He has to work hard to reach his goal." - very true in the above person.

[astroboy]

Kandan ji and my dear friends,

Please do not take what I am writing without the golder rule - " All other factors being equal " . These are stand alone indicators . do not forget that . Please do not forget that . You have to amalgamate all other factors to come to a conclusion . Please do not take one strand and try to weave a cloth .

Best regard's

[Nitin21]

Dear Astroboy and Coolantji,

I am Dhanishtha 3rd Pada for Lagna and Ardra 2nd pada for moon. How do i interpret my chart on nakshatra basis. ? Dhanistha is ruled by Mars. But 3rd pada is ruled by Venus.

similarly Ardra is Ruled by Rahu but 2nd pada is ruled by Saturn.

My lagna lord Saturn is in 5th in Ardra 4th pada. Thankfully it is ruled by Jupiter.

Any insights will be appreciated.

Regards
Sonu

[kandhan]

Sonuji

mind if u can give ur Birth Details? i remember nodes in 4-10 axis.

[Nitin21]

Nobody wants to read my chart.. whats the use of giving birth details

[swamykool]

Hi guys,

Uploaded it again. This is the problem with free accounts, all sorts of limitations.

http://rapidshare.com/files/457098596/Nakshatras.pdf

OR

https://rcpt.yousendit.com/1093783967/2 ... a289aea784

swamykool

[kandhan]

Mars is AK as per Drik and Sat as per SSS.

the way your defend your religious beliefs i wud say Drik is more accurate.

[swamykool]

Kandhan ji and Sonu ji,

Problem solved. I uploaded it again on two diff servers. And Sonu ji, I did not receive your email.

swamykool

[Nitin21]

Mars is AK as per Drik and Sat as per SSS.

the way your defend your religious beliefs i wud say Drik is more accurate.

Kandhanji the gentleman who has worked on my btr is far more divine, clairvoyant, daivagnya and qualified than both of us. Pl take sss only. I shall explain in detail later

[Nitin21]

Kandhan ji and Sonu ji,

Problem solved. I uploaded it again on two diff servers. And Sonu ji, I did not receive your email.

swamykool

Sirji email was for kandhan to give him your pdf.

[swamykool]

Ok then.

[milredr]

by astrosonu » Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:53 pm

Dear Astroboy and Coolantji,

I am Dhanishtha 3rd Pada for Lagna and Ardra 2nd pada for moon. How do i interpret my chart on nakshatra basis. ? Dhanistha is ruled by Mars. But 3rd pada is ruled by Venus.

similarly Ardra is Ruled by Rahu but 2nd pada is ruled by Saturn.

My lagna lord Saturn is in 5th in Ardra 4th pada. Thankfully it is ruled by Jupiter.

Any insights will be appreciated.

Regards
Sonu

Hi I am also waiting for a reply on this. Pl reply.

Regards

[astroboy]

Good day P. Mahesh Ji ,

1) You seems to write only negative aspects of the stars... which include the Rohini in which you mention even
great people like Sri Krishna took birth...

Dear sir , The entire reason I started this thread was to highlight the negative points of a Nakshatra . Many a times you come across a horoscope where inspite of no apparent afflictions , One finds that the individual is on Shiit street . The actual culprits are the nakshatras, But we look desperately for the negatives in the planets and find none. My endevour is to bring out the negatives of a nakshatra and nothing else . That was the first thing I wrote before I started the "Nakshatras thread" .

2) in the above example: you are taking SAT and Mars as 8th and 6th lords and say cause afflictions.
You are egnoring the fact that SAT is also 9th lord and Mars is also 11th Lord (in fact both are mola-trikonas).
Then, can you say they cause affliction and makes negative traits of the nakshatra?

I am well aware that Shani is the 9th and kuja is the 11th lord . This is precisely why he ruled Iraq for 20 odd years . It is the same negative traits of the Nakshatra that helped him stay in power with such ruthlessness . Was it good for him while the going was good ?? Yes it was . Did these same traits finally contribute to his death. Yes it did . In the mean time , these negative traits screwed Iran and the Iraqi citizens . Never forget that .

3) Normally, people consider the Janma Nakshatra (occupied my moon) for looking at traits of a person.
What makes you to consider the Nakshatra of the Lagna (the Asc)?
The Nakshatra of the moon and lagna have to be both considered when you talk about a man's traits . You have to also consider the Nakshatra of Budha , to get a wholesome analysis . This is the task that makes Jyotishya so difficult and confusing . I never said it is a easy task . You have to understand that we have moved largely from a Moon based analysis to a Lagna centric one . The lagna is essentially "You" . The Moon is the individual "Mind" . One cannot live without the other . Please wait for me to finish Anuradha Nakshatra ( Saddam's Nakshatra ) You will be suprised at how much those traits match Saddam's . In Saddam's case , I chose the lagna over chandra because It is stronger of the two . Note that the moon is in debilitation . Thus Ardra took centre stage .

4) When you say a planet apsects a Nakshatra, do you consider usual rules of aspects (and within say 5 deg. only)?

I did not understand your question .

5) When a Naksatra is afflicted, do you say that the houses that star lord owns, occupies and its natural karakatwa
take negative traits? If not they take poitive traits?

We are concerned with the psychological aspects of a Nakshatra . Your question has to be answered on a case to case basis . I will explain this with a example in due course .

[astroboy]

Sorry , Missed this one

6) Finally, can you apply same logic to nakshatras consists in all other houses? say for example, 10th house
has two nakshatras. One is afflicted and other receives strong benefic aspects... what can you say about
the results of 10th house?

let me put it this way . Lagna is Makara . Let us say Chandra and Kuja are in lagna . Chandra is in Shravana , and Kuja is in Dhanishta . Both happen to be in their own nakshatras . Now bring in Guru who is debilitated here . let us place Guru in Danishta . Guru gets a Neecha Bhanga , But by placing Guru in Danishta Guru get a even stronger Neecha Bhanga . 1. he is in the lagna , 2. he is in the Chandra lagna, 3. He is Dig Bala in the 1st, 4. he is in Danishta , the lord of Danishta is Kuja , who is exalted and a good friend of Guru , and finally Guru is with a exalted planet .

You need to take this on a case to case basis. Give me a horoscope , I will try to analyse it for you .

[astroboy]

Suppose Leo (10th house) contains SUN. since it is own house, 10th would be strong. But suppose
the nakshatras (and their lords) in Leo are afflicted and say weak, can the strength of Rasi lord (SUN)
overtake the weakness of the stars and make Loe strong?

There are three Nakshatra's In Leo . Magha . Purva Phalguni and Uttara Phalguni . The Rulers are Ketu / Shukra / Ravi . Now if Ravi is In Uttara Phalguni Ruled by Ravi himself , They take it for granted that Ravi is super strong . If Ravi is the 10th lord, Shukra is the 7th and the 12th lord . You Have not said where Shukra is placed . As far as Magha Goes , I dont know where Ketu is . So Its difficult for me to give you a clear picture .

[astroboy]

Can Nakshatras in a house take more control over that house than the owner of that house or occupants
of that house?

Take Aries . this house is divided by 3 . Land is owned By Kuja , But each Nakshatra has built a house there . Who is powerful ?? Kuja owns the land , But the Nakshatras own the house . You decide .

[lovacrs]

Kandhan ji,

i know only one Rohini Nakshtra person. although the person is charming none of the negative traits are exhibited. ofcourse, the universal rule is to look at other factors too.

Edited:

" he will suffer because of friends who are evil in nature. ....... He has to work hard to reach his goal." - very true in the above person.

I know a native who has Mo, Su, Ve, and Ra all in Rohini. I dont see much evidence of the negative traits.

[kandhan]

CRSji

as Deepakji has pointed out, the whole chart has to be looked at. secondly, in his current thread he is pointing out only the negative traits so that it can be useful when one is clueless.