Banter? Frankly, I find Howzat's position completely logical given:explorings wrote:howzat wrote:
Please refrain from undermining, belittling, and intimidating others if you have no intentions to provide logical explanations from astrological POV.
This is why I have repeatedly and humbly requested you to take your banter elsewhere.
1. Howzat is essentially saying that it is pointless to analyse a chart and attribute it to a person (BT in this case) when one doesn't even have access to BT's fundamental details - correct birth year and time in this case. This is perfectly valid in my humble opinion.
2. He is questioning the analysis that is essentially based on suspect data. Unless and until one can confirm data sanctity everything else becomes mere speculation. He has very humbly requested if correct data can be accessed and provided.
3. Trying to fit a famous person's life and personality to a chart that is built on erroneous data makes it even worse.
3. He is right in saying there is a lot of garbage and misleading information on the internet. Unless you have personally validated the data, there is no point in just spreading misinformation further.
He is neither belittling nor demeaning. Some of the posts here are rather patronising and condescending towards him - isn't it natural that he will react? Moreover, one also has to understand that for someone whose first language is not English, the written word can appear harsher than what it actually means to convey.





