"I have done in my posting is establish the limitations of Shiva in certain aspects"
I have absolutely no idea as to what you have understood by Shiva and what you have understood by Sriman Narayana. You are stuck up as to Shiva with trishoola pani and Narayana with Gada, chakra and so on. These are images and pictures of form.
Now, Brahmam or Brahman is completely incomparable state where there is no forms including your Gada or chakra, where all are one.
Forms are of finite state, but Brahman is of infinite and unending one. if you fit a form to Brahman, how it will become infinite? God, clearly tells this in Bhagavad Gita.
"Avajananti mam mudha
manusim tanum asritam
param bhavam ajananto
mama bhuta-mahesvaram"
"Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form. They do not know My transcendental nature and My supreme dominion over all that be."
THESE ARE ALMIGHTY'S WORDS WHICH IS COMING FROM SOURCE. HE CALLS A PERSON WHO FITS HIM TO A FORM AS A "FOOL" DO I NEED TO TELL MORE?
This transcendental nature is what is called as "Supreme Brahaman, that is what is called as Narayana or Shiva, the same is devi, the same is brahma as far as I am concerned"
When you confine God to an object, he in fact is becoming finite and you are actually tying him down to time, place and person. But, Brahmam is just vice versa, it is wide spread accessibility universally at the sametime anywhere, not confined to any boundaries.
This is exactly the reason why Lord tells those who confine me are fools.
"They do not understand me, my Vibhuti, my accessibility and simply see me as an object or idol and start ding-donging in my name"
When you put forth a name or form to reality, it just shades and shrinks down. It's manifestation is limited and hence, it cannot be called Brahmam.
You please have experience first, then comment on.
"No "bodily" experience is POSSIBLE as long as this sharira is bound by laws of prakriti"
Again, please do not make nonsense comments. Does not ramana maharishi experience it when Maharishi was in a body? Does not Swami Vivekananda experience it when Swami was in a body? But, they did not experience it as if they are in a body and that is all the difference.
Ramana Maharishi only knows Arunachala as Maharishi's breath and virtually everything as a father. Does not Ramana Maharishi got Moksha? Ramana Maharishi hardly objected Sriman Narayana, but for Maharishi everybody is the same. You may please first get some treatment for your problem. Please stop making comments on Mahatamas and Maha Jnanis saying that only you are correct and those jnanis who do not worship Narayana does not get Moksha.
Shankara Bhagavad Padal said "Nischala Thattawe Jeevan Mukithihi" meaning the stillness can only give Jeevan Muktha State. Where is the Gada, chakra and forms coming there? Or now you may also comment on that even Shankara Bhagavad Padal is also wrong?
There is some real problem with you...
Regards
Narayanan



