Should chandra Lagnadhipati be considered benefic always?
Forum rules
READ Forum-Wide Rules and Guidelines NOTICE: OFFENSIVE POSTS WILL BE DELETED, AND OFFENDERS WILL HAVE ALL POSTS MODERATED.
READ Forum-Wide Rules and Guidelines NOTICE: OFFENSIVE POSTS WILL BE DELETED, AND OFFENDERS WILL HAVE ALL POSTS MODERATED.
In the book "Notable Horoscopes", while discussing Abraham Lincoln's horoscope, Dr. BV Raman states "Mark the position of the Moon in the 12th in the constellation of the Sun and aspected by two first-rate malefics, of which, Saturn as Chandra Lagnadhipati becomes a benefic"
Re: Should chandra Lagnadhipati be considered benefic always?
I am told lagna and chadralagna both have to be given equal importance while reading a chart . In fact which of the two is stronger gives correct prediction . If the decision is arrived at by calculating all the balas , nothing better than that . So when a dilemma comes as to why predictions are going wrong , a chart has to be studied from Chandra lagna taking it as lagna .
-
- Contributor
- Posts:60
- Joined:05 Feb 2019
Re: Should chandra Lagnadhipati be considered benefic always?
Hari, that is the reason why it is termed as "Lord of auspiciousness" (Shubhapati).
Re: Should chandra Lagnadhipati be considered benefic always?
Thanks Priya12 and Krishna for the response.
In fact I have seen BV Raman calling the Subhapati a benefic in multiple places of the book. Will share more such instances when I come across them.
In fact I have seen BV Raman calling the Subhapati a benefic in multiple places of the book. Will share more such instances when I come across them.