Astrology & Astronomy: Fundamental basis 1. Space & Time Math calculations of Astral Physics 2. Interpretation & Meaning

For discussion on planets, houses, signs, nakshatras, etc.
Forum rules
READ Forum-Wide Rules and Guidelines NOTICE: OFFENSIVE POSTS WILL BE DELETED, AND OFFENDERS WILL HAVE ALL POSTS MODERATED.
Post Reply
insight
Newly Registered User
Newly Registered User
Posts: 1
Joined: 25 Feb 2018

Astrology & Astronomy: Fundamental basis 1. Space & Time Math calculations of Astral Physics 2. Interpretation & Meaning

Post by insight » 19 Apr 2019

Astrology & Astronomy: Fundamental basis 1. Space & Time Math calculations of Astral Physics 2. Interpretation & Meaning

Is this not the fundamental premise & basis of Jyotish Vidya? - whatever frameworks we use for 1 & 2

Step 1. The Math & Physics of intersections & absolute/ relevant positions in Time & Space

and/ or

Step 2. Interpretation & Meaning of said context to said Vyakti (Person), Vasthu (Object/ Place, Paristithi (Scenario/ Event/ events)

Right?

If such is the case the various frameworks (eastern western, vedic, north/ south, purnamantic, amantic etc) used in either of the major steps are nothing by "FRAMES of Reference" to TAP into the ABSOLUTE HAPPENING.. and
1. MEASURE & CALCULATE IT
2. INTERPRET ITS SIGNIFICANCE.

With each framework having a Reference System, Measurement & Calculation mechanisms/ logic & Meaning/ Interpretation reference and mechanisms/ logic; albeit each with some strengths & weaknesses.

Right?

In conclusion, we are ATTEMPTING to DIVE DEEP into a certain SPACE-TIME INTERSECTION & its RELEVANCE/ SIGNIFICANCE in 4 Dimensions (3D + Time).

PS: Please add anything more or less to the above.

I have interesting thoughts to share.



User avatar
lefteye
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor
Posts: 300
Joined: 12 Apr 2019

Re: Astrology & Astronomy: Fundamental basis 1. Space & Time Math calculations of Astral Physics 2. Interpretation & Mea

Post by lefteye » 07 Oct 2019

Is this not the fundamental premise & basis of Jyotish Vidya? - whatever frameworks we use for 1 & 2

Step 1. The Math & Physics of intersections & absolute/ relevant positions in Time & Space

and/ or

Step 2. Interpretation & Meaning of said context to said Vyakti (Person), Vasthu (Object/ Place, Paristithi (Scenario/ Event/ events)

Right?
Science is sought after by us for the visible logic it uses. We get irrational in praising Science the way we get rational in criticising faith related issues. When God particle was discovered it was named by the team leader as goddamn particle originally.

He was an atheist,indeed. It took some 20 plus years to find out these particles and out of sheer frustration he named it as goddamn. The director of the project or institute-I don't remember exactly- re named it as God particle. We witnessed lot of books using Natraja symbol everywhere in blogs and fb celebrating the discovery.But there is no connection between these things.

By chronology Jyotisha is senior to Science. It has got a legacy of 5000 years.It has been using logic,clear and well defined with minor changes in processing.

Science is not like this. We should know that the celebrated science-is just a coincidence of things. Electricity was in use before 100 years-when electrons were discovered :lol: . I don't find any fresh legible inputs in Dalton's theory than Ganadhara's atomic theory in Vaisheshika.

People who were working on chemicals discovered much about electrons. After Bohr's model, some Schrodinger equation was borrowed from Wave Mechanics to explain it in 1933. Because Bohr used Planck's theory to explain electron energy levels. Together they have made us to believe dual nature concept which is quite unnatural. :lol: It may take another 20 years to get a fresh theory. Jyotisha is not changing its basics and it is more logical.

The first antibiotic-penicillin was discovered accidentally.X Rays discovered accidentally. :D
But we have clearly guided medicine books in Ayurveda with well defined logic.
भव शंकर देशिक मे शरणम्

Post Reply